It’s not often that I am completely caught off guard, but
this definitely took me by surprise. It
was a normal Thursday, a little chilly compared to the rest of the week, but
still good bubble weather. I stopped at
Target on my way in (as I do about once a week) since my friend Bella was in
dire need of caffeine, and since I needed snacks for my drawer it was no
hardship. I got my desk in order and
promptly dove into the large stack of financial aid applications. In retrospect there were a few things that
should have tipped me off that something was not right.
I suppose I need to provide a little bit of background
information. I worked for a non-profit
organization that works in conjunction with other organizations to strengthen
and build communities. Every employee
and volunteer needs to pass a criminal background check since our organization
works with children and potentially sensitive information. My last few weeks have been occupied by
processing mounds of financial aid application, and hundreds of product request
forms. I had been sending out emails by
the hundreds, asking for additional information in order to process the
applications, and I began getting responses in the beginning of June.
One of the applications that I received additional
information on included a letter from the primary applicant’s “significant
other”, stating that they would pay for the child to go to a summer
program. This application was the
beginning of the end. I was unsure if
this significant other was actually a part of the applicants’ household, so I
decided to conduct a quick google search to see if the applicant had other
individuals listed in the household. My
first search, using the address only, yielded no results. In the subsequent search I added in the
applicants name and found more than I bargained for. The first result on the list was a news
article regarding the applicant and criminal charges they had against them. The charges listed in the article were such that
I became concerned for the safety of others, so I used my knowledge of the resources
available to search for public information to determine if the charges had
resulted in convictions. I then printed
the list of convictions and handed the list together with the application to my
supervisor Joelle. I asked her if this
is something that we should be concerned with, given the nature of the
convictions and the fact that we were currently dealing with another individual
with a similar but worse situation.
Joelle stated she would need to talk to the manager of the call center
about this issue.
A few days later Joelle sat down with me in the Call Center
Manager’s office to tell me this was indeed a serious matter that I should not,
under any circumstance, but researching people in this manner. I explained to her why I had conducted the
search in the first place, and then why I had pursued the information further
after discovering what I thought was a concerning matter. I also explained that due to the other, more
serious situation, I thought finding out if the charges became convictions was
in the best interests of the organization.
It was at this point that I was told that she would need to take my
responses back to HR and that this was a very serious matter. I explained further that I was under the
impression that she had heard of the other situation and so I thought it was my
duty to report what I had accidentally uncovered.
Apparently I was quite wrong and should have just pretended I didn’t find
anything.
When I was asked to step into the manager’s office I
anticipated a written warning for this matter, however, I knew it was something
infinitely more serious when I saw an HR specialist in the office waiting for
me with Joelle. This particular HR
representative had always seemed to be a false person to me, in that their
smile was never genuine and any good humor was just a facade. I was told within minutes of sitting down
that I was terminated for creating a liability for the organization based on
the information I had located. It was
not explained to me how it was a liability or why this course of action was
ultimately chosen, but I was to be ‘escorted’ from the building. Joelle retrieved my purse and duffel bag from
my desk. She got up to walk me out of
the office, but I quickly outpaced her, leaving that drama far behind.
I do not intend to return to that building for any reason
whatsoever. When I received a text
message from Joelle later concerning the rest of the crap from my desk, I was inflexibly
courteous in my reply. I stated that I
could come on Saturday or Sunday to retrieve my boxes, to which I received a
reply to come in during normal business hours.
I replied that I did not wish to come by the office during normal
business hours as I would feel the need to explain my dismissal to my former
co-workers, which I believed was a situation that the organization would prefer
to avoid. Joelle responded that they
would have my things sent out by courier in the morning.
You know what, fine. I
was planning to look for a new job this year anyhow, and this dismissal has
simply forced my hand. I’m done with the
nonprofit scene – I’m aiming for a job with a good corporation. Show me the money…
Ciao
Fuuuuuuuuuuuck
ReplyDelete